PYS 2.23–26: Von Avidyā zu Kaivalya
PYS 2.23–26: Von Avidyā zu Kaivalya

Yogaśāstra 2.23–26: Separating Puruṣa and Prakṛti

Avidyā connects puruṣa and buddhi. Uninterrupted knowledge of their difference ends this conjunction; puruṣa remains unmixed and alone in kaivalya.

Dr. Ronald Steiner Dr. Ronald Steiner Laura von Ostrowski Laura von Ostrowski
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.23
स्वस्वामिशक्त्योः स्वरूपोपलब्धिहेतुः संयोगः ||23||
sva-svāmi-śaktyoḥ svarūpopalabdhi-hetuḥ saṃyogaḥ ||23|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
sva
dvandva-compound
substantive neuter
of the property
svāmi
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive masculine
of the proprietor
śaktyoḥ
genitive dual
substantive feminine
of the two powers
svarūpa
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive neuter
of their own forms
upalabdhi
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive feminine
apprehension
hetuḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
cause
saṃyogaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
conjunction
Conjunction (saṃyogaḥ | nom sg) [is] the cause of the apprehension of the respective natures (svarūpopalabdhi-hetuḥ | nom sg) of the powers of property [prakṛti] and proprietor [puruṣa] (sva-svāmi-śaktyoḥ | gen du).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Through contact with the world (saṃyoga), you can recognise your abilities and limits more clearly. Relationship becomes a mirror in which your own way of being (svarūpa) can continue to unfold.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Puruṣa as owner is joined with the seen as its possession: cognition of the seen is bhoga, while cognition of the seer's own nature is apavarga. Once this function of seeing has been completed, the conjunction ends. Discriminative knowledge removes its opposite, non-seeing (adarśana), and thus the cause of bondage.

The Vyāsa-Bhāṣya then cites several doctrinal views of what precisely this non-seeing might be—including an operation of the guṇa, failure to see while the object is present, avidyā as the seed of citta, or even the power of seeing itself—and leaves these alternatives side by side.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
The conjunction is the cause of the apprehension of the actual condition of the natures of the possessed and the possessor.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Conjunction is the cause of the recognition of the natures of the faculties of itself and that of its Lord’s.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Die Ursache des Wahrnehmens der Wesenheit des Besessenen [der prakṛti] vermöge der Potenzen des Besessenen und des Besitzers [der prakṛti und des puruṣa] ist ihre Verbindung.
Paul Deussen - 1908
The reason for the apperception of what the power of the property and of what the power of the proprietor are is correlation.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.24
तस्य हेतुरविद्या ||24||
tasya hetur avidyā ||24|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
tasya
genitive singular masculine
pronoun dem
of that conjunction
hetuḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
cause
avidyā
nominative singular
substantive feminine
ignorance
The cause (hetuḥ | nom sg) of this [conjunction] (tasya | gen sg) [is] ignorance (avidyā | nom sg).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
When a connection binds you, ask what lack of clarity (avidyā) is at work within it. Perhaps you are taking an expectation, a role, or a fear for the whole of reality.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The cause of the individual consciousness's conjunction with its buddhi is avidyā, explained here as a vāsanā of erroneous cognition. As long as buddhi has not attained knowledge of puruṣa, it has not completed its task and arises again. With perfected knowledge of puruṣa, the cause of bondage disappears, buddhi ceases its activity and does not return.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
The cause thereof is to be quitted viz., ignorance.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
its cause is Ignorance ;
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Die Ursache dieser [Verbindung] ist das Nichtwissen.
Paul Deussen - 1908
The reason for this [correlation] is undifferentiated consciousness (avidyā).
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.25
तदभावात्संयोगाभावो हानं तद्दृशेः कैवल्यम् ||25||
tad-abhāvāt saṃyogābhāvo hānaṃ tad-dṛśeḥ kaivalyam ||25|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
tad
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
pronoun dem
of that ignorance
abhāvāt
ablative singular
substantive masculine
because of the absence
saṃyoga
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive masculine
of conjunction
abhāvaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
absence
hānam
nominative singular
substantive neuter
cessation
tad
karmadhāraya-compound
pronoun dem
that
dṛśeḥ
genitive singular
substantive feminine
of seeing
kaivalyam
nominative singular
substantive neuter
isolation
From the absence of that [ignorance] (tad-abhāvāt | abl sg) follows the absence of conjunction (saṃyogābhāvaḥ | nom sg). This cessation (hānam | nom sg) [is] the isolation (kaivalyam | nom sg) of the power of seeing [puruṣa] (tad-dṛśeḥ | gen sg).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
As confusion recedes, more inner space can open within relationship (kaivalya). Freedom can mean staying connected without losing yourself.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

When non-seeing ends, the conjunction of buddhi and puruṣa and thus bondage end completely. This removal (hāna) is kaivalya for the seer: being unmixed and never again conjoined with the guṇa. When the cause of suffering has been removed, puruṣa abides in its own nature.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
The ‘quitting’ consists on the surcease of the conjunction on that (ignorance); this is the isolation of the Soul.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
From its absence, there is absence of conjunction, (which is) avoidance ; and that is the Isolation of the spectator.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Besteht dies nicht mehr, so besteht auch die Verbindung nicht mehr, sondern ein Freisein [vom Leiden], und dieses ist die Isolation des Sehens [dḥ. des puruṣa].
Paul Deussen - 1908
Since this [non-sight] does not exist, there is no correlation. This is the escape, the Isolation of the Seer.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.26
विवेकख्यातिरविप्लवा हानोपायः ||26||
viveka-khyātir aviplavā hānopāyaḥ ||26|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
viveka
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive masculine
of discrimination
khyātiḥ
nominative singular
substantive feminine
discernment
aviplavā
nominative singular feminine
adjective
unwavering
hāna
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive neuter
of cessation
upāyaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
means
The means of cessation (hānopāyaḥ | nom sg) [is] unwavering (aviplavā | nom sg f) discriminative knowledge [of puruṣa and prakṛti] (viveka-khyātiḥ | nom sg).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Cultivate steady discernment (viveka-khyāti): What is fact, what is interpretation, what is feeling, and what is need? Return to this clarification before you decide.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Viveka-khyāti is cognition of the difference between sattva and puruṣa. As long as erroneous knowledge persists, it wavers. Once that knowledge has become like a burned and sterile seed, a clear, uninterrupted stream of discrimination arises in sattva, purified of kleśa and rajas. It prevents erroneous knowledge from arising again and is the path to liberation.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
The means of quitting (the state of bondage) is discriminative knowledge not discontinuous.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Undisturbed discriminative knowledge is the means of avoidance.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Das Mittel dieses Freiseins ist die ungestörte Erkenntnis des Unterschiedes [zwischen puruṣa und prakṛti].
Paul Deussen - 1908
The means of attaining escape is unwavering discriminative discernment.
James Haughton Woods - 1914

Continue with AYI Free

Illustrations: AI-generated.

Editor

Dr. Ronald Steiner

From Ulm

The "Yoga Doc" - Dr. Ronald Steiner is the founder of the AYI method. This method links traditional Ashtanga Yoga with innovative Yogatherapy and living Philosophy. This forms a practice that is personal for each and... more ›

Laura von Ostrowski

Ich bin 2004 das erste Mal mit Yoga in Berührung gekommen und habe seitdem unendlich viele Facetten kennengelernt. Einerseits die vielfältigen praktischen Seiten von Yoga - in Form verschiedener Ausbildungen (500 h... more ›

Messages and ratings
2 messages

Please log in to write a message. Go to login

S
Hi Ronald, ich hab zu diesem (und zum nachfolgenden Yoga Sūtra Abschnitt einige Fragen, weiß aber nicht, ob Du das hier liest. :) Sind die Gedanken, die hier geäußert werden, nicht dieselben wie im Vedanta? Ich leide, weil ich nicht weiß, dass ich immer Bewusstsein-Gewahrsein bin und weil ich mich mit dem Ego, also mit dem feinstofflichen Körper identifiziere?
Herzliche Grüße,
Stefan
Hallo Stefan,
obwohl die Grundlagen von Vedanta, Samkhya und Tantra völlig verschieden sind, ist die meditative Erfahrung und auch das Ergebnis im Alltag oft überraschend ähnlich. Hier in der Tat. Denke diese Aussage könnte auch im Vedanta so stehen. Vielleicht mit ein bisschen anderen Worten.
- Im Samkhya ist der Körper inkl. Geist (Citta) real aber nicht göttlich. Die Essenz (Drashtu) identifiziert sich mit dem vergänglichen Körper und Geist. Daraus entsteht Leiden. Wenn wir diese Identifikation erkennen und sie wieder lösen, entsteht Freiheit von Leiden.
- Im Vedanta ist der Körper und unser Gefühl der Getrenntheit eine Illusion, aber eine göttliche. Leiden lösen wir, indem wir die Illusion auflösen und alles als eines wahrnehmen.
Viel Freude beim Ergründen und erfahren.
Namaste und bis ganz bald
Ronald