PYS 2.3–9: Fünf Kleśa
PYS 2.3–9: Fünf Kleśa

Yogaśāstra 2.3–9: Forms of False Cognition

Avidyā nourishes asmitā, rāga, dveṣa, and abhiniveśa. These misapprehensions keep the transformation of the guṇas, karma, and rebirth in motion.

Dr. Ronald Steiner Dr. Ronald Steiner Laura von Ostrowski Laura von Ostrowski
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.3
अविद्यास्मितारागद्वेषाभिनिवेशाः क्लेशाः ||3||
avidyāsmitā-rāga-dveṣābhiniveśāḥ kleśāḥ ||3|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
avidyā
dvandva-compound
substantive feminine
ignorance
asmitā
dvandva-compound
substantive feminine
I-am-ness
rāga
dvandva-compound
substantive masculine
attachment
dveṣa
dvandva-compound
substantive masculine
aversion
abhiniveśāḥ
nominative plural
substantive masculine
clinging to life
kleśāḥ
nominative plural
substantive masculine
afflictions
Ignorance, egoity, attachment, aversion and clinging to life (avidyāsmitā-rāga-dveṣābhiniveśāḥ | nom pl) [are] the afflictions (kleśāḥ | nom pl).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
When you feel inwardly constricted, gently notice what is at work: not seeing clearly (avidyā), clinging to a self-image (asmitā), grasping (rāga), pushing away (dveṣa), or fear of loss (abhiniveśa). Naming a pattern creates space without defining you by it.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Vyāsa-Bhāṣya defines the five kleśa as five forms of erroneous cognition (viparyaya). When active, they reinforce the operation of the guṇa, sustain transformation, swell the stream of cause and effect and, by supporting one another, bring about karmic fruition.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
The afflictions are ignorance, egotism, desire, aversion and tenacity (of Mundane existence).
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Ignorance, Egoism, Desire, Aversion, and Attachment are the five distractions.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Die fünf kleśa sind: Nichtwissen Egoismus, Liebe, Haß und Lebenshang.
Paul Deussen - 1908
Undifferentiated-consciousness (avidyā) and the feeling-of-personality and passion and aversion and the will-to-live are the five <1> hindrances.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.4
अविद्या क्षेत्रमुत्तरेषां प्रसुप्ततनुविच्छिन्नोदाराणाम् ||4||
avidyā kṣetram uttareṣāṃ prasupta-tanu-vicchinnodārāṇām ||4|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
avidyā
nominative singular
substantive feminine
ignorance
kṣetram
nominative singular
substantive neuter
breeding ground
uttareṣām
genitive plural masculine
adjective
of the following four
prasupta
dvandva-compound past participle passive
previx
verbal root
dormant
tanu
dvandva-compound
adjective
attenuated
vicchinna
dvandva-compound past participle passive
previx
verbal root
interrupted
udārāṇām
genitive plural masculine
adjective
fully operative
Ignorance (avidyā | nom sg) [is] the field (kṣetram | nom sg) of the remaining [four afflictions] (uttareṣām | gen pl m), whether dormant, attenuated, interrupted or fully manifest (prasupta-tanu-vicchinnodārāṇām | gen pl m).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Inner patterns (kleśa) have different intensities: they may lie dormant, grow faint, disappear for a while, or fill the whole field (prasupta, tanu, vicchinna, udāra). Notice their strength before you act.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Avidyā is the breeding ground of the remaining kleśa. The Vyāsa-Bhāṣya explains their four conditions: dormant as a mere seed-potential, attenuated by cultivating an opposing idea, interrupted while another kleśa temporarily emerges, and fully active in relation to an object. In the adept whose kleśa-seeds have been burned, their inability to germinate constitutes a fifth condition. All kleśa are forms of avidyā and diminish as it diminishes.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
Ignorance is the field of the others, whether they be dormant extenuated, intercepted or simple.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Ignorance is the breeding ground for those that follow—( whether they be ) dormant, weak, intercepted, or operative.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Das Nichtwissen (avidyā) ist der Boden für die übrigen [vier], mögen sie nun schlummernd (latent), schwach, zwiespältig [unter einander] oder voll entwickelt sein.
Paul Deussen - 1908
Undifferentiated-consciousness (avidyā) is the field for the others whether they be dormant or attenuated or intercepted or sustained.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.5
अनित्याशुचिदुःखानात्मसु नित्यशुचिसुखात्मख्यातिरविद्या ||5||
anityāśuci-duḥkhānātmasu nitya-śuci-sukhātma-khyātir avidyā ||5|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
anitya
dvandva-compound
adjective
impermanent
aśuci
dvandva-compound
adjective
impure
duḥkha
dvandva-compound
substantive neuter
painful
anātmasu
lokative plural
substantive masculine
in non-selves
nitya
dvandva-compound
adjective
eternal
śuci
dvandva-compound
adjective
pure
sukha
dvandva-compound
substantive neuter
pleasure
ātma
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive masculine
self
khyātiḥ
nominative singular
substantive feminine
conception
avidyā
nominative singular
substantive feminine
ignorance
Ignorance (avidyā | nom sg) [is] the cognition of permanence, purity, pleasure and selfhood (nitya-śuci-sukhātma-khyātiḥ | nom sg) in what is impermanent, impure, painful and not-self (anityāśuci-duḥkhānātmasu | loc pl).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Pause when you look for security in what is passing, fulfilment in what weighs you down, or your whole identity in a single role (avidyā). Ask yourself: What is actually true and life-giving here?
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Vyāsa-Bhāṣya unfolds the fourfold error: the impermanent is taken to be permanent, the body—described in stark terms as thoroughly impure—to be pure, suffering to be happiness, and the non-self, such as body or mind, to be the self. Avidyā is the root of the sequence of kleśa and of the karmic deposit together with its fruition. It is not merely an absence of knowledge but a cognition opposed to knowledge.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
Ignorance (avidyā) is the notion that the uneternal, the impure, evil and what is not soul are (severally) eternal, pure, joy and soul.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Ignorance is the notion of the identity of the eternal, the pure, the joyous and the spirit, with that which is non-eternal, impure, painful and non-spirit.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Nichtwissen (avidyā) ist die Auffassung des Nicht-Ewigen, Unreinen, Leidvollen und Nicht-Selbstes als ewig, rein, lustvoll und als das Selbst.
Paul Deussen - 1908
The recognition of the permanent, of the pure, of pleasure, and of a self in what is impermanent, impure, pain, and notself is undifferentiated-consciousness.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.6
दृग्दर्शनशक्त्योरेकात्मतेवास्मिता ||6||
dṛg-darśana-śaktyor ekātmatevāsmitā ||6|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
dṛk
dvandva-compound
substantive feminine
of the seer
darśana
tatpuruṣa-compound genitive
substantive neuter
of the instrument of seeing
śaktyoḥ
genitive dual
substantive feminine
of the two powers
eka
karmadhāraya-compound
numeral
one
ātmatā
nominative singular
substantive feminine
identity
iva
particle
as if
asmitā
nominative singular
substantive feminine
I-am-ness
Egoity (asmitā | nom sg) [is] as though (iva) the unity (ekātmatā | nom sg) of the power of the seer [puruṣa] and the power of the instrument of seeing [buddhi] (dṛg-darśana-śaktyoḥ | gen du).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
When awareness (dṛg) becomes fused with the instrument through which you perceive (darśana), a passing experience can quickly become “me” (asmitā). Feel a thought or bodily state without making it your whole identity.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Asmitā is the apparent identity of the power of seeing, puruṣa, and the power of cognition, buddhi. Although experiencer and experienced are utterly distinct and unmixed, experience becomes possible when they appear undivided; realization of their respective natures is kaivalya.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
Egotism (asmitā) is the identifying of the power that sees with the power of seeing.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Egoism is the identifying of the power that sees with the power of seeing.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Egoismus (asmitā) ist die Identifikation der Potenzen des Sehenden und des Sehens [des puruṣa und des Innenorgans, bei welchem letztern Organ und Funktion nach Sāṃkhya-Kārikā 29: svālakṣaṇyam vṛttis trayasya, zusammenfallen.]
Paul Deussen - 1908
When the power of seeing and the power by which one sees have the appearance (iva) of being a single-self, [this is] the feeling-of-personality.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.7
सुखानुशयी रागः ||7||
sukhānuśayī rāgaḥ ||7|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
sukha
tatpuruṣa-compound lokative
substantive neuter
upon pleasure
anuśayī
nominative singular masculine
adjective
resting
rāgaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
attachment
Attachment (rāgaḥ | nom sg) [is] that which follows an experience of pleasure (sukhānuśayī | nom sg m).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Pleasure leaves a trace and can turn into grasping (rāga). Enjoy what feels good (sukha) without needing to hold onto it or make it happen again.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Rāga is craving, thirst or greed for pleasure or its means, arising from the memory of pleasure previously experienced.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
Desire is what dwells on pleasure.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Desire is that which dwells on pleasure.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Auf Lust beruhend ist die Liebe.
Paul Deussen - 1908
Passion is that which dwells <1> upon pleasure.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.8
दुःखानुशयी द्वेषः ||8||
duḥkhānuśayī dveṣaḥ ||8|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
duḥkha
tatpuruṣa-compound lokative
substantive neuter
upon pain
anuśayī
nominative singular masculine
adjective
resting
dveṣaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
aversion
Aversion (dveṣaḥ | nom sg) [is] that which follows an experience of pain (duḥkhānuśayī | nom sg m).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Pain can leave a trace of pushing away (dveṣa). Honour your boundaries without turning every reminder of discomfort (duḥkha) into an enemy.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Dveṣa is the aversion to pain or its means that arises from the memory of pain: resistance, resentment, the wish to harm and anger.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
Aversion is what dwells on pain.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
Aversion is that which dwells on pain.
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Auf Schmerz beruhend ist der Haß.
Paul Deussen - 1908
Aversion <1 > is that which dwells upon pain.
James Haughton Woods - 1914
Patañjali Yoga Sūtra 2.9
स्वरसवाही विदुषो ऽपि तथा रूढो ऽभिनिवेशः ||9||
svarasa-vāhī viduṣo 'pi tathā rūḍho 'bhiniveśaḥ ||9|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
svarasa
tatpuruṣa-compound instrumental case
substantive masculine
by its own momentum
vāhī
nominative singular masculine
adjective
carried onwards
viduṣaḥ
genitive singular masculine
adjective
of the learned
api
particle
even
tathā
particle
likewise
rūḍhaḥ
nominative singular masculine past participle passive
verbal root
firmly rooted
abhiniveśaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
clinging to life
Clinging to life (abhiniveśaḥ | nom sg), flowing by its own inclination (sva-rasa-vāhī | nom sg m), [is an affliction] likewise (tathā) firmly rooted (rūḍhaḥ | nom sg m ppp) even (api) in the learned person (viduṣaḥ | gen sg).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
The impulse to protect life (abhiniveśa) is part of being human and can arise even in experienced practitioners. Feel the ground, seek supportive contact, and let the breath remain free.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

Abhiniveśa appears in the wish common to all living beings: “May I not cease to be.” From the fear of death found even in a newly born worm, the Vyāsa-Bhāṣya infers suffering at death experienced in former births. The resulting vāsanā is rooted in the learned as well as in the ignorant.

Yoga Śāstra Vyāsa-Bhāṣya
tathā rūḍho ] samārūḍho TKVD2019
tathā rūḍho ] samā-rūḍhaḥ CYS2026
Critical Apparatus

tathā rūḍhaḥ means roughly “thus rooted or established,” whereas samārūḍhaḥ emphasizes being firmly or fully mounted/established. KYMV2026 confirms the shorter PE1904 reading, while TKVD2019 and CYS2026 have samārūḍhaḥ. The variant changes nuance rather than the basic claim; verse meter does not decide it.

Apparatus Comment
Continuant through its self-reproductive property, even on the part of the wise attachment to the body is ‘tenacity of life’.
James R. Ballantyne - 1852
The well-known (distraction), that which flows in the current of its own residua, and which is well known to the learned even, is Attachment (or Tenacity of Life).
Ganganatha Jha - 1907
Die auch beim Weisen vorhandene, auf Selbstgeschmecktem [in einer frühern Geburt] beruhende (besser: vom Geschmack, Wohlgefallen an dem eigenen Selbst begleitete) Anhänglichkeit an den Leib ist der Lebenshang.
Paul Deussen - 1908
The will-to-live (abhiniveça) sweeping on [by the force of] its own nature <1> exists in this form even in the wise.
James Haughton Woods - 1914

Continue with AYI Free

Illustrations: AI-generated.

Editor

Dr. Ronald Steiner

From Ulm

The "Yoga Doc" - Dr. Ronald Steiner is the founder of the AYI method. This method links traditional Ashtanga Yoga with innovative Yogatherapy and living Philosophy. This forms a practice that is personal for each and... more ›

Laura von Ostrowski

Ich bin 2004 das erste Mal mit Yoga in Berührung gekommen und habe seitdem unendlich viele Facetten kennengelernt. Einerseits die vielfältigen praktischen Seiten von Yoga - in Form verschiedener Ausbildungen (500 h... more ›

Messages and ratings
4 messages Ø

Please log in to write a message. Go to login

Hallo Ronald,
Folgende Frage zum Text. Wozu sollte meine Wahre Natur Körper und Geist als Projektionsfläche für Erfahrungen nutzen? Wessen Erfahrungen? Ist damit gemeint, das die Wahre Natur sich nur mit Hilfe von oder über Körper und Geist erkennen lässt?
Woher kommt der Antrieb, das ich meine wahre Natur erkennen will?
Woran erkenne ich, dass ich
meiner wahren Natur auf der Spur bin?
Was ist die wahre Natur?
Ich denke, dass sie für alle gleich sein muss. Nur jeder wird anderes sehen und meinen, das ist sie.
Wer ist überhaupt der in mir, der sucht?

Namaste
und schöne Weihnachten!
Gerald
Hallo Gerald,
das Yoga Sutra ist letztendlich aus der Sankhya Perspektive geschrieben.
Ein tiefes Eintauchen wünscht Dir
Ronald
Hallo Ronald,
Vielen Dank für deine schnelle Antwort! Seid gestern lese ich wiederholt und mit großer Freude deine Mail und reflektiere über deren Inhalt. Du sagst, die Essenz kann sich selbst erfahren. Dann ist es die Essenz, die mich antreibt. Das muss ich weiter auf mich wirken lassen.
Die Samkhya hatte ich noch nicht auf dem Schirm. Meine spirituelle Inspiration ziehe ich aus der Bhagavat gita und dem Yoga sutra und weiterer spiritueller Literatur. Ich werde mir die Samkhya anschauen.

Bis bald und vielen Dank!
Namaste
Gerald
Hallo Gerald,

wau. Du stellst die großen Fragen, die die Yogis seit Jahrtausenden beschäftigen.
- In der Tat gab es hier schon viele verschiedene Antworten. Ich bin mir sicher Du wirst auch viele für Dich passende finden.
In der Samkhya Philosophie bleibt die Entstehung der Schöpfung (~i~Prak.rti~~) letztendlich ein großes Geheimnis. Die Schöpfung existiert und unsere Essenz kann sich schließlich selbst erfahren und wieder von ihr lösen.
Viel Freude beim Fragen stellen und Antworten finden wünscht Dir

Ronald

P.S.: Übrigens - In der Advanced Ausbildung diskutieren wir genau über diese Fragen sehr intensiv.