yuje vāṃ brahma, pūrvyaṃ namobhir; vi śloka etu, pathyeva sūreḥ | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
yuje
|
I yoke, connect | |
|
vām
|
of you both | |
|
brahma
|
the sacred word, Brahman | |
|
pūrvyam
|
the ancient, primordial | |
|
namobhiḥ
|
with homage, acts of reverence | |
|
vi
|
far and wide, forth | |
|
ślokaḥ
|
the call, song of praise | |
|
etu
|
may it go, proceed | |
|
pathyā
|
on the path, way | |
|
iva
|
like, as | |
|
sūreḥ
|
of the sage, of the sun |
śṛṇvanti viśve, amṛtasya putrā; ā ye dhāmāni, diviyāni tasthuḥ ||5|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara understands the verse as a prayer to comprehend primordial Brahman with veneration and composure. The praise is to spread like the good path or the fame of a sage. The 'sons of the Immortal', the heavenly descendants of Hiraṇyagarbha, are to hear it.
Śaṅkarānanda takes the pair 'you two' to refer to the individual and the highest Self. Their yoga is identity, because both are in truth the one beginningless Brahman, without spatial, temporal or substantial limitation. Veneration also leads the unlearned onto the good path which the sages tread through the performance of their duties.
In the ritual interpretation, Nārāyaṇa takes Brahman to mean the vital forces and the 'primordial' to mean food, which is offered as it were in eating and united with the prāṇas. Yogically, the supplicant directs mind and insight towards Brahman through devotion; with the aid of the sun, the five Savitṛ mantras are to open the path and even penetrate the solar disc.
Vijñānabhagavat formulates a resolve towards composure: speech and mind are fixed in the inner Self so that beginningless Brahman is directly known. The resulting praise is to follow the path of the sages and be heard by Hiraṇyagarbha and the other 'sons of the Immortal' in their heavenly abodes.
śṛṇvanti LV1958 ] śṛṇvantu ASS1927, LV1958-app
diviyāni LV1958 ] divyāni ASS1927
<1: This stanza also = RV. 10. 13. 1; VS. 11. 5. Lines a, b, c with slight variants = AV. 18. 3. 39 b, c, d.>
<1: For this verse, see Taitt. Samh. IV, 1, 1, 2, 1; Vāg. Samh. XI, 5; Atharva-veda XVIII, 3, 39; Rig-veda X, 13, 1. The Vāgasaneyins read vi sloka etu for vi slokā yanti; sūreh for sūrāh; srinvantu for srinvanti; and the Rig-veda agrees with them. The dual vām is accounted for by the verse belonging to a hymn celebrating the two sakatas, carts, bearing the offerings (havirdhāne); most likely, however, the dual referred originally to the dual deities of heaven and earth. I prefer the text of the Rig-veda and the Vāgasaneyins to that of the Taittirīyas, and have translated the verse accordingly. In the Atharva-veda XVIII, 39, if we may trust the edition, the verse begins with svāsasthe bhavatam indave nah, which is really the end of the next verse (Rv. X, 13, 2), while the second line is, vi sloka eti pathyeva sūrih srinvantu visve amritāsa etat. I see no sense in pathyeva sūrāh. Saṅkara explains pathyeva by pathi sanmārge, athavā pathyā kīrtih, while his later commentary, giving srinvantu and putrāh sūrātmano hiranyagarbhasya, leads one to suppose that he read sūreh srinvantu. Sāyana (Taitt. Samh. IV, 1, 1, 2) explains pathyā sūrā iva by gīrvānamārga antarikshe sūryarasmayo yathā prasaranti tadvat. The same, when commenting on the Rig-veda (X, 13, 1), says: pathyā-iva sūreh, yathā stotuh svabhūtā pathyā parināmasukhāvahāhutir visvān devān prati vividham gakkhati tadvat. Mahīdhara (Vāg. Samh. XI, 5) refers sūreh (panditasya) to slokah, and explains pathyeva by patho ’napetā pathyā yagñamārgapravrittāhutih.>
<2: Yuge cannot stand for yuñge, as all commentators and translators suppose, but is a datival infinitive. Neither can yuñgate in the following verse stand for yuṅkte (see Boehtlingk, s. v.), or be explained as a subjunctive form. A. reads adhirudhyate, B. abhirudhyate, with a marginal note abhinudyate. It is difficult to say whether in lighting the fire the wind should be directed towards it, or kept from it.>
<1: The text in Weber’s edition of the Yajur V. is, with the following exceptions, the same as in the Upanishad: Instead of “Slokā yanti” Weber reads, “Slokā etu;” instead of “Sūrā,” “Sūreḥ;” and instead of “Śrinwanti,” “Śrinwantu.” To show in an example the difference of the explanation, I translate here this verse according to Mahīdhara’s commentary. “O you sacrificer and his wife, for your sake I perform (at present) with food (namobhir) the ancient (work called) Bramha (a kind of fire offering). (By Bramha the caste of the Brāhmanas may also be understood.) May the fame of the wise (of the sacrificer), reach the two worlds, as the oblation does. May all the sons of the immortal (Prajāpati) who inhabit divine dwellings, hear (the praise of the sacrificer).”>
Continue with AYI Free
Illustrations: AI-generated.
Please log in to write a message. Go to login
No messages yet.