According to the Vyāsa-Bhāṣya, the tranquil flow (praśānta-vāhitā) of Citta depends on the strength acquired by repeatedly cultivating the imprints of cessation. When these grow weak, they are again overwhelmed by the imprints that belong to emergence.
sarvārthataikāgratayoḥ kṣayodayau cittasya samādhi-pariṇāmaḥ ||11|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
Dispersion across many objects (sarvārthatā) and one-pointedness (ekāgratā) are both properties of Citta according to the Vyāsa-Bhāṣya. Its samādhi-pariṇāma consists in the concealment of the former and the manifestation of the latter, while Citta persists as the bearer of both.
tataḥ punaḥ śāntoditau tulya-pratyayau cittasyaikāgratā-pariṇāmaḥ ||12|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
tatas
|
then | |
|
punar
|
again, again, finally | |
|
śānta
|
calmed down, gone, extinguished | |
|
uditau
|
emerged, emerged | |
|
tulya
|
same, similar | |
|
pratyayau
|
Ideas, impressions | |
|
cittasya
|
Perceptual space | |
|
ekāgratā
|
One-pointedness, one-pointedness | |
|
pariṇāmaḥ
|
transformation |
In ekāgratā-pariṇāma, the preceding cognition of the collected Citta has become quiescent and the succeeding cognition has arisen; both are alike. Citta in samādhi follows both without falling out of concentration.
tataḥ presents the transformation into one-pointedness as following from the preceding process (“then/from that”). tatra instead locates it “there/in that state.” Both are grammatically straightforward but give the argument a slightly different emphasis. The Sūtra meter label does not decide the reading.
Continue with AYI Free
Illustrations: AI-generated.
Please log in to write a message. Go to login
No messages yet.