jāgarita-sthāno vaiśvānaro 'kāraḥ prathamā mātrāpter ādimattvād vā | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains contemplation of the letter a in relation to waking. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains contemplation of the letter a in relation to waking. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes contemplation of the letter a in relation to waking. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes contemplation of the letter a in relation to waking. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
svapna-sthānas taijasa ukāro dvitīyā mātrotkarṣād ubhayatvād vā | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
utkarṣati ha vai jñāna-saṃtatiṃ samānaś ca bhavati nāsyābrahmavit kule bhavati ya evaṃ veda ||10|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
utkarṣati
|
elevates | |
|
ha
|
indeed | |
|
vai
|
verily | |
|
jñāna
|
knowledge | |
|
saṃtatiṃ
|
continuity | |
|
samānaḥ
|
equal | |
|
ca
|
and | |
|
bhavati
|
becomes | |
|
na
|
not | |
|
asya
|
his | |
|
abrahmavit
|
one ignorant of Brahman | |
|
kule
|
in the family | |
|
bhavati
|
becomes | |
|
yaḥ
|
who | |
|
evam
|
thus | |
|
veda
|
knows |
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains contemplation of the letter u in relation to dream. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains contemplation of the letter u in relation to dream. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes contemplation of the letter u in relation to dream. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes contemplation of the letter u in relation to dream. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
jñānasaṃtatiṃ samānaś Anand1900 ] jñānasantatim | samānaś LV1958
samānaś ca bhavati nāsyābrahmavit Anand1900 ] samānaś ca bhavati | nāsyābrahmavit LV1958
<2: The expression may mean equable, impartial, equalized with the universe, or the same as that which he knows.>
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains contemplation of the letter m in relation to deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains contemplation of the letter m in relation to deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes contemplation of the letter m in relation to deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes contemplation of the letter m in relation to deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
<3: Possibly as a synonym for another meaning of miti, ‘destroying’ or ‘perishing.’>
<4: That is, out of his own consciousness, according to the subjective-idealist theory expounded here.>
Continue with AYI Free
Illustrations: AI-generated.
Please log in to write a message. Go to login
No messages yet.