svapna-sthāno 'ntaḥ-prajñaḥ saptāṅga ekona-viṃśati-mukhaḥ pravivikta-bhuk taijaso dvitīyaḥ pādaḥ ||4|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
svapna
|
dream | |
|
sthānaḥ
|
sphere | |
|
antaḥ
|
inward | |
|
prajñaḥ
|
cognizing | |
|
sapta
|
seven | |
|
aṅga
|
limbed | |
|
ekona
|
one short of | |
|
viṃśati
|
twenty | |
|
mukhaḥ
|
mouths | |
|
pravivikta
|
subtle | |
|
bhuj
|
enjoying | |
|
taijasaḥ
|
Taijasa | |
|
dvitīyaḥ
|
second | |
|
pādaḥ
|
quarter |
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains Taijasa as inwardly directed dream consciousness. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains Taijasa as inwardly directed dream consciousness. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes Taijasa as inwardly directed dream consciousness. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes Taijasa as inwardly directed dream consciousness. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
yatra supto na kaṃ-cana kāmaṃ kāmayate na kaṃ-cana svapnaṃ paśyati tat suṣuptam | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
suṣupta-sthāna ekī-bhūtaḥ prajñāna-ghana evānanda-mayo hy ānanda-bhuk ceto-mukhaḥ prājñas tṛtīyaḥ pādaḥ ||5|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
suṣupta
|
deep sleep | |
|
sthānaḥ
|
sphere | |
|
ekī
|
one | |
|
bhūtaḥ
|
become | |
|
prajñāna
|
consciousness | |
|
ghanaḥ
|
mass | |
|
eva
|
indeed | |
|
ānanda
|
bliss | |
|
mayaḥ
|
consisting of | |
|
hi
|
for | |
|
ānanda
|
bliss | |
|
bhuj
|
enjoying | |
|
cetas
|
consciousness | |
|
mukhaḥ
|
mouths | |
|
prājñaḥ
|
Prājña | |
|
tṛtīyaḥ
|
third | |
|
pādaḥ
|
quarter |
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains Prājña as the unified, bliss-like causal condition in deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains Prājña as the unified, bliss-like causal condition in deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes Prājña as the unified, bliss-like causal condition in deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes Prājña as the unified, bliss-like causal condition in deep sleep. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
<1: The sentence to this point occurs already at Bṛh. 4.3.19.>
<2: A detailed description of being unified occurs at Bṛh. 4.4.2.>
<3: This compound occurs at Bṛh. 4.5.13.>
<4: A description of the self consisting of bliss occurs at Tait. 2.5.>
eṣa sarveśvara eṣa sarvajña eṣo 'ntaryāmy eṣa yoniḥ sarvasya prabhavāpyayau hi bhūtānām ||6|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains Prājña as lord, omniscient inner ruler, origin, and return of beings. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains Prājña as lord, omniscient inner ruler, origin, and return of beings. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes Prājña as lord, omniscient inner ruler, origin, and return of beings. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes Prājña as lord, omniscient inner ruler, origin, and return of beings. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
sarvasya prabhavāpyayau Anand1900 ] sarvasya | prabhavāpyayau LV1958
<5: A phrase in Bṛh. 4.4.22.>
<6: A phrase in Muṇḍ. 1.1.9 and 2.2.7.>
<7: The subject of discourse in Bṛh. 3.7.>
<8: Literally, ‘womb.’>
<9: A phrase in Kaṭha 6.11.>
nāntaḥ-prajñaṃ na bahiṣ-prajñaṃ nobhayataḥ-prajñaṃ na prajñāna-ghanaṃ na prajñaṃ nāprajñam | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
na
|
not | |
|
antaḥ
|
inward | |
|
prajñaṃ
|
cognizing | |
|
na
|
not | |
|
bahis
|
outward | |
|
prajñaṃ
|
cognizing | |
|
na
|
not | |
|
ubhayatas
|
both-wise | |
|
prajñaṃ
|
cognizing | |
|
na
|
not | |
|
prajñāna
|
consciousness | |
|
ghanam
|
mass | |
|
na
|
not | |
|
prajñaṃ
|
cognizing | |
|
na
|
not | |
|
aprajñam
|
non-cognizing |
adṛṣṭam avyavahāryam agrāhyam alakṣaṇam acintyam avyapadeśyam ekātma-pratyaya-sāraṃ prapañcopaśamaṃ śāntaṃ śivam advaitaṃ caturthaṃ manyante | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
adṛṣṭam
|
unseen | |
|
avyavahāryam
|
beyond transaction | |
|
agrāhyam
|
ungraspable | |
|
alakṣaṇam
|
without mark | |
|
acintyam
|
unthinkable | |
|
avyapadeśyam
|
indescribable | |
|
eka
|
one | |
|
ātma
|
Self | |
|
pratyaya
|
assurance | |
|
sāram
|
essence | |
|
prapañca
|
manifestation | |
|
upaśamam
|
cessation | |
|
śāntam
|
peaceful | |
|
śivam
|
auspicious | |
|
advaitam
|
non-dual | |
|
caturtham
|
fourth | |
|
manyante
|
they consider |
Gaudapāda’s Kārikā reads the passage through ajāti (non-origination) and explains the Fourth through the negation of every empirical mode and as non-dual peace. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkara explains the Fourth through the negation of every empirical mode and as non-dual peace. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Ānandagiri sharpens Śaṅkara’s argument and emphasizes the Fourth through the negation of every empirical mode and as non-dual peace. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
Śaṅkarānanda presents the passage in a meditative and systematic way and emphasizes the Fourth through the negation of every empirical mode and as non-dual peace. Its terms are treated as stages in recognizing the one Ātman, not as independent realities.
sa ātmā sa Anand1900 ] sa ātmā | sa LV1958
<10: Or, according to the reading ekātma-, ‘the oneness of the Self’ or ‘one’s own self.’>
<11: Later philosophical treatises generally use turīya as the technical designation for the fourth state.>
Continue with AYI Free
Illustrations: AI-generated.
Please log in to write a message. Go to login
No messages yet.