aṇor aṇīyān, mahato mahīyān; ātmā guhāyāṃ, nihito 'sya jantoḥ | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
tam akratuṃ, paśyati vīta-śoko; dhātu-prasādān, mahimānam īśam ||20|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara gives two interpretations of dhātuprasāda: the grace of the creator through which true knowledge arises, or the clarity of the body-supporting senses after insight into the defects of objects has loosened their outward attachment.
Śaṅkarānanda understands the decisive prasāda either as the merciful glance of the creator of the world or as purity of the inner organ. Through it, the person free from Avidyā recognises the desireless Self in its greatness and as the independent Lord.
Nārāyaṇa relates grace variously to the Self, the creator or the Guru. In the compound reading dhātuprasāda, it means the tranquillity and Sattva-purity of the senses. Both paths explain how the sorrowless person knows the hidden Self.
Vijñānabhagavat reads dhātuprasāda as the gathering of the senses: they are withdrawn from hard-to-control objects and the mind turns inward. The seeker thus knows the desireless inner Self as the non-dual Lord and becomes free from the sorrow of Saṃsāra.
<1: Vgl. über diesen Vers die Anmerkungen zu Mahānār. 10,1. Kāṭh. 2,20 (oben S. 247. 274).>
<1: This stanza = TA. 10. 10. 1 (= Mahānār. 10. 1, or in the Atharva Recension 8. 3), and also, with slight variation, Kaṭha 2. 20.>
<1: Vgl. über diesen Vers die Anmerkungen zu Mahānār. 10,1. Kāṭh. 2,20 (oben S. 247. 274).>
<1: Cf. Taitt. Ār. X, 12 (10), p. 800; Kaṭh. Up. II, 20; above, p. 11. The translation had to be slightly altered, because the Śvetāśvataras, as Taittirīyas, read akratum for akratuḥ, and īśam for ātmanaḥ.>
<1: Of all animate beings.>
<2: This is a view of the Sānkhya. The whole verse is taken from the Kāṭhaka U. (2,20), where, however kratu is read instead of kraturo, and ātmanaḥ instead of īśam.>
vedāham etam, ajaraṃ purāṇaṃ; sarvātmānaṃ, sarva-gataṃ vibhutvāt | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
janma-nirodhaṃ, pravadanti yasya; brahma-vādino, hi pravadanti nityam ||21|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara understands the verse as the confirming experience of the seer of the mantra. He knows the immutable, ancient and all-pervading Self. The Brahmavādins teach its birthlessness and thus its timeless permanence.
Śaṅkarānanda mentally supplies the ignorant as the subject of the first clause: they ascribe birth and destruction to the Self. The Brahmavādins, by contrast, have known reality and unequivocally teach it as birthless, deathless and eternal.
Nārāyaṇa either considers the reading “they proclaim no birth” meaningful or understands the transmitted form in stages: the deluded speak in ignorance of birth and death, whereas those versed in the Veda recognise the eternity attested in many Vedic statements.
Vijñānabhagavat offers two interpretations of janmanirodha. Either world-creation and world-dissolution are actions of the Lord, or the cessation of further individual birth is intended. In both cases the seer confirms the same ageless, omnipresent Paramātman.
<1: Cf. Taitt. Ār. III, 13, 1; III, 12, 7.>
<2: A. reads vedārūḍham, not B.>
<3: A. and B. read brahmavādino hi pravadanti.>
Continue with AYI Free
Illustrations: AI-generated.
Please log in to write a message. Go to login