SVU 4.6-4.10: Two Birds and Māyā
SVU 4.6-4.10: Two Birds and Māyā

SVU 4.6-4.10: Bound Self, Witness and the Appearance of the World

The image of the birds distinguishes the suffering self from the witnessing Lord; texts and sacrifices arise from the Imperishable, and the world arises from the Māyā of the wielder of Māyā.

Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 4.6
द्वा सुपर्णा सयुजा सखाया समानं वृक्षं परिषस्वजाते |
dvā suparṇā, sayujā sakhāyā; samānaṃ vṛkṣaṃ, pariṣasvajāte | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
dvā
nominative dual masculine
numeral
two
suparṇā
nominative dual
substantive masculine
beautiful-winged birds
sayujā
nominative dual masculine
adjective
closely joined
sakhāyā
nominative dual
substantive masculine
two friends
samānam
accusative singular masculine
adjective
the same
vṛkṣam
accusative singular
substantive masculine
tree
pariṣasvajāte
3rd person dual medial perfekte
previx
verbal root
both have embraced
तयोरन्यः पिप्पलं स्वाद्वत्त्यनश्नन्नन्यो अभिचाकशीति ||6||
tayor anyaḥ, pippalaṃ svādv atty; anaśnann anyo, abhicākaśīti ||6|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
tayoḥ
genitive dual masculine
pronoun dem
of the two
anyaḥ
nominative singular masculine
pronoun quant
the one
pippalam
accusative singular
substantive neuter
fig fruit
svādu
accusative singular neuter
adjective
sweet
atti
3rd person singular aktive present
verbal root
he eats
anaśnan
nominative singular masculine present participle active
previx
verbal root
not eating
anyaḥ
nominative singular masculine
pronoun quant
the other
abhicākaśīti
3rd person singular aktive present intensive
previx
verbal root
he looks on, shining
Metre: Pāda 1: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending — 10 syllables; Pāda 2: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending; Pāda 3: Triṣṭubh — 9 syllables; Pāda 4: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending
Two (dvā | nom du m) beautiful-winged birds (suparṇā | nom du), closely joined (sayujā | nom du m), two friends (sakhāyā | nom du), have embraced (pariṣasvajāte | 3p du med perf) the same (samānam | acc sg m) tree (vṛkṣam | acc sg). Of the two (tayoḥ | gen du m), one (anyaḥ | nom sg m) eats (atti | 3p sg act pres) the fig fruit (pippalam | acc sg), the sweet one (svādu | acc sg n); not eating (anaśnan | nom sg m pca), the other (anyaḥ | nom sg m) looks on, shining (abhicākaśīti | 3p sg act pres inte).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Two beautiful-winged birds, inseparable friends, sit on the same tree. One eats the sweet fruit, while the other watches without eating.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara sees in the two birds Jīva and Paramātman on the same tree of the body. The Jīva, shaped by Avidyā, desire and latent impressions, enjoys the diverse fruits of Karma; the ever pure and free Lord remains the unbound witnessing observer.

Śaṅkara's Bhāṣya on the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad

Śaṅkarānanda interprets the common tree as the perishable double body. The Jīva possesses merit and demerit as if they were wings and tastes their pleasure and pain; Īśvara is connected with Avidyā only as Lord and remains all-luminous without any claim to enjoyment.

Śaṅkarānanda's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Nārāyaṇa calls the two birds the conscious Jīva and Paramātman, who always embrace the same perishable body. Only the Jīva consumes the fruit grown from Karma; Paramātman does not eat but shines unchanged.

Nārāyaṇa's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Vijñānabhagavat explains the duality through reflection and original. Jīva and Lord appear through Avidyā as a limited reflection and unlimited consciousness on the many-branched tree of the body. The reflection assumes the tree's qualities and fruits of Karma, while the original remains self-luminous and unchanged.

Vijñānabhagavat's Śvetāśvataropaniṣadvivaraṇa
„Zwei schönbeflügelte, verbundene Freunde Umarmen einen und denselben Baum; Einer von ihnen speist die süße Beere, Der andre schaut, nicht essend, nur herab.“<1>
<1: Der Vers Ṛgv. 1,164,20 wird als Vers 6 zitiert und (Vers 7) im Sinne der Vedāntalehre (vgl. namentlich Kāṭh. 3,1, oben S. 276) interpretiert. Die ursprüngliche Bedeutung ist eine ganz andre (vgl. darüber Gesch. d. Phil. I, 112). Vers 6–7 kehren Muṇḍ. 3,1,1–2 wieder. — Hieran schließt sich, etwas unvermittelt, Vers 8 = Ṛgv. 1,164,39, wohl um den Om-Laut als den Weg zu Gott durch Berufung auf denselben Ṛgvedahymnus zu erweisen.>
Paul Deussen - 1921
Two birds, fast bound companions, Clasp close the self-same tree. Of these two, the one<1> eats sweet fruit; The other<2> looks on without eating.<3>
<1: That is, the individual person.>
<2: That is, the universal Brahma.>
<3: This stanza = RV. 1. 164. 20 and Muṇḍ. 3. 1. 1.>
Robert Hume - 1921
Two beautiful-winged birds (or two beings of good movement) ever-connected, and friends, resort to the same tree (or body); of these the one eats the fruit of varied or (attractive) taste, while the other shines (or looks) without eating (the fruit).
Siddhesvar Varma Shastri - 1916
„Zwei schönbeflügelte, verbundene Freunde Umarmen einen und denselben Baum; Einer von ihnen speist die süße Beere, Der andre schaut, nicht essend, nur herab.“<1>
<1: Der Vers Ṛgv. 1,164,20 wird als Vers 6 zitiert und (Vers 7) im Sinne der Vedāntalehre (vgl. namentlich Kāṭh. 3,1, oben S. 276) interpretiert. Die ursprüngliche Bedeutung ist eine ganz andre (vgl. darüber Gesch. d. Phil. I, 112). Vers 6–7 kehren Muṇḍ. 3,1,1–2 wieder. — Hieran schließt sich, etwas unvermittelt, Vers 8 = Ṛgv. 1,164,39, wohl um den Om-Laut als den Weg zu Gott durch Berufung auf denselben Ṛgvedahymnus zu erweisen.>
Paul Deussen - 1897
Two birds, inseparable friends, cling to the same tree. One of them eats the sweet fruit, the other looks on without eating.<1>
<1: The same verses occur in the Muṇḍaka Up. III, 1.>
F. Max Müller - 1884
Two birds,<1> (the supreme and the individual souls) always united, of equal name, dwell upon one and the same tree (the body). The one of them (the individual soul), enjoys the sweet fruit of the fig-tree, the other (the supreme soul) looks round as a witness.
<1: This and the next verses are literally taken from the Mund. U. iii, 1–2.>
Edward Röer - 1853
Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 4.7
समाने वृक्षे पुरुषो निमग्नो अनीशया शोचति मुह्यमानः |
samāne vṛkṣe, puruṣo nimagno; anīśayā, śocati muhyamānaḥ | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
samāne
lokative singular masculine
adjective
on the same
vṛkṣe
lokative singular
substantive masculine
tree
puruṣaḥ
nominative singular
substantive masculine
person, individual self
nimagnaḥ
nominative singular masculine past participle passive
previx
verbal root
sunk
anīśayā
instrumental case singular
substantive feminine
through powerlessness
śocati
3rd person singular aktive present
verbal root
he grieves
muhyamānaḥ
nominative singular masculine present participle medial
verbal root
becoming deluded
जुष्टं यदा पश्यत्यन्यमीशं अस्य महिमानमिति वीतशोकः ||7||
juṣṭaṃ yadā, paśyaty anyam īśaṃ; asya mahimānam, iti vīta-śokaḥ ||7|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
juṣṭam
accusative singular masculine past participle passive
verbal root
favoured, gracious
yadā
adverb
when
paśyati
3rd person singular aktive present
verbal root
he sees
anyam
accusative singular masculine
pronoun quant
the other
īśam
accusative singular
substantive masculine
Lord
asya
genitive singular masculine
pronoun dem
his
mahimānam
accusative singular
substantive masculine
greatness
iti
particle
thus
vīta
bahuvrīhi-compund past participle passive
previx
verbal root
freed from
śokaḥ
nominative singular masculine bahuvrīhi-compund
substantive masculine
free from sorrow
Metre: Pāda 1: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending; Pāda 2: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending; Pāda 3: Triṣṭubh — 10 syllables; Pāda 4: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending — 12 syllables
On the same (samāne | loc sg m) tree (vṛkṣe | loc sg), the Puruṣa (puruṣaḥ | nom sg) [is] sunk (nimagnaḥ | nom sg m ppp); because of his powerlessness (anīśayā | ins sg), he grieves (śocati | 3p sg act pres), becoming deluded (muhyamānaḥ | nom sg m pcm). When (yadā) he sees (paśyati | 3p sg act pres) the gracious one (juṣṭam | acc sg m ppp), the other (anyam | acc sg m) Lord (īśam | acc sg), and his (asya | gen sg m) greatness (mahimānam | acc sg), he is thus (iti) [made] free from sorrow (vīta-śokaḥ | nom sg m bv).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
On the same tree the individual self sits immersed in helplessness, confused and full of sorrow. When it recognises the other—the gracious Lord—and his greatness, it becomes free from suffering.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara portrays the bound person as overwhelmed by identification with the body: birth, kinship, loss and powerlessness create grief. After long purification, the person knows the other, innermost Lord as their own Self and becomes free from the entire ocean of sorrow.

Śaṅkara's Bhāṣya on the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad

Śaṅkarānanda sees the Jīva sunk through beginningless habits in anxiety and delusion. As soon as it directly knows the self-luminous Self of joy, distinct from Avidyā and its effects, as Lord and its own greatness, all grief falls away together with ignorance.

Śaṅkarānanda's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Nārāyaṇa explains the sinking as identification with the shared body. The Jīva regards itself as powerless and clings to sensory objects. When it knows the Lord made gracious through worship and his greatness, it becomes free from grief.

Nārāyaṇa's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Vijñānabhagavat interprets powerlessness as the superimposition of the five sheaths. Through hearing, reflection and contemplation with a teacher, the prepared Jīva recognises that the unlimited greatness of the supposedly other Īśvara is its own innermost Self; this direct knowledge destroys Saṃsāra and its cause.

Vijñānabhagavat's Śvetāśvataropaniṣadvivaraṇa
asya mahimānam LV1958, ASS1927 ] tanmahimānam Hauschild apud LV1958-app
Critical Apparatus
Zu solchem Baum der Geist, herabgesunken, In seiner Ohnmacht grämt sich wahnbefangen; Doch wenn er ehrt und schaut des andern Allmacht Und Majestät, dann weicht von ihm sein Kummer.
Paul Deussen - 1921
On the self-same tree a person, sunken, Grieves for his impotence, deluded; When he sees the other, the Lord (īś), contented, And his greatness, he becomes freed from sorrow.<1>
<1: This stanza = Muṇḍ. 3. 1. 2.>
Robert Hume - 1921
The individual soul, entangled in the same tree (or body), being deluded, grieves on account of powerlessness; when he sees another Being, i.e., God, pleased (or served by Him) and His greatness, he is freed from sorrow.
Siddhesvar Varma Shastri - 1916
Zu solchem Baum der Geist, herabgesunken, In seiner Ohnmacht grämt sich wahnbefangen; Doch wenn er ehrt und schaut des andern Allmacht Und Majestät, dann weicht von ihm sein Kummer.
Paul Deussen - 1897
On the same tree man sits grieving, immersed, bewildered, by his own impotence (an-īśa). But when he sees the other lord (īśa) contented, and knows his glory, then his grief passes away.
F. Max Müller - 1884
Dwelling on the same tree (with the supreme soul) the deluded soul (the individual soul), immersed, (in the relations of the world) is grieved by the want of power; but when it sees the other, the (long) worshipped ruler as different (from all worldly relations) and his glory, then its grief ceases.
Edward Röer - 1853
Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 4.8
ऋचो अक्षरे परमे व्योमन्यस्मिन्देवा अधि विश्वे निषेधुः |
ṛco akṣare, parame vyoman; yasmin devā, adhi viśve niṣedhuḥ | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
ṛcaḥ
genitive singular
substantive feminine
of the Ṛc verse
akṣare
lokative singular
substantive neuter
in the Imperishable
parame
lokative singular neuter
adjective
in the highest
vyoman
lokative singular
substantive neuter
in heavenly space
yasmin
lokative singular neuter
pronoun rel
in which
devāḥ
nominative plural
substantive masculine
the gods
adhi
particle
upon it
viśve
nominative plural masculine
adjective
all
niṣedhuḥ
3rd person plural aktive perfekte
previx
verbal root
they have settled
यस्तन्न वेद किमृचा करिष्यति य इत्तद्विदुस्त इमे समासते ||8||
yas tan na veda, kim ṛcā kariṣyati; ya it tad vidus, ta ime samāsate ||8|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
yaḥ
nominative singular masculine
pronoun rel
who
tat
accusative singular neuter
pronoun dem
that
na
particle
not
veda
3rd person singular aktive perfekte
verbal root
he knows
kim
accusative singular neuter
pronoun inter
what
ṛcā
instrumental case singular
substantive feminine
with the Ṛc verse
kariṣyati
3rd person singular aktive future
verbal root
he will accomplish
ye
nominative plural masculine
pronoun rel
those who
it
particle
precisely
tat
accusative singular neuter
pronoun dem
that
viduḥ
3rd person plural aktive perfekte
verbal root
they know
te
nominative plural masculine
pronoun dem
they
ime
nominative plural masculine
pronoun dem
these here
samāsate
3rd person plural medial present
previx
verbal root
they are gathered
Metre: Pāda 1: Triṣṭubh — 10 syllables; Pāda 2: Triṣṭubh with Śālinī ending; Pāda 3: Jagatī with Vaṃśa ending; Pāda 4: Jagatī with Vaṃśa ending
The [essence] of the Ṛc verse (ṛcaḥ | gen sg) [rests] in the Imperishable (akṣare | loc sg), in the highest (parame | loc sg n) heavenly space (vyoman | loc sg), in which (yasmin | loc sg n) all (viśve | nom pl m) the gods (devāḥ | nom pl) have settled (niṣedhuḥ | 3p pl act perf), resting thereon (adhi). He who (yaḥ | nom sg m) does not (na) know (veda | 3p sg act perf) that (tat | acc sg n)—what (kim | acc sg n) will he accomplish (kariṣyati | 3p sg act fut) with the Ṛc verse (ṛcā | ins sg)? Those who (ye | nom pl m) know (viduḥ | 3p pl act perf) precisely (it) that (tat | acc sg n), they (te | nom pl m)—these here (ime | nom pl m)—are gathered together (samāsate | 3p pl med pres).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
The imperishable essence of the sacred verse rests in the highest heavenly space, where all the gods have their seat. What use is the sacred verse to someone who does not know this? Those who know it are gathered here.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara grounds the Vedas and gods in the imperishable highest space. Whoever does not know Paramātman gains nothing from the mere Ṛc; whoever truly knows him rests fulfilled and has reached the goal.

Śaṅkara's Bhāṣya on the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad

Śaṅkarānanda distinguishes word-Brahman from its ground of meaning. The Vedas, their meanings, deities or organs rest in highest Brahman. One who knows only words misses their purpose; the true knowers become absorbed in all-pervading joy.

Śaṅkarānanda's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Nārāyaṇa stresses that mere recitation and teaching of the Ṛc without knowledge of its imperishable ground remains useless. Those who know this ground are truly collected and united with it.

Nārāyaṇa's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Vijñānabhagavat assigns the Vedas both a preparatory and a consummating function. Rites and worship purify the inner organ; hearing, reflection and contemplation then disclose Akṣara as one's own Self. Without this knowledge of unity, even the whole of Vedic practice remains without its ultimate purpose.

Vijñānabhagavat's Śvetāśvataropaniṣadvivaraṇa
„Des Hymnus Laut im höchsten Himmelsraume, Auf dem gestützt die Götter alle thronen, Wenn man den nicht kennt, wozu hilft der Hymnus dann? — Wir, die ihn kennen, haben uns versammelt hier.“
Paul Deussen - 1921
That syllable of the sacred hymn (ṛc, Rig-Veda) whereon, in highest heaven, All the gods are seated—Of what avail is the sacred hymn (ṛc, Rig-Veda) to him who knows not That? They, indeed, who know That, are here assembled.<1>
<1: This stanza = RV. 1. 164. 39.>
Robert Hume - 1921
What will he do with (the study of) the Rig (and other Vedas) who does not know Him, the Eternal, Supreme and All-pervading Being (like ether), in whom all the gods and the Rig (and other Vedas) sustain their existence; those who know Him in this way, they attain the True Stage.
Siddhesvar Varma Shastri - 1916
„Des Hymnus Laut im höchsten Himmelsraume, Auf dem gestützt die Götter alle thronen, Wenn man den nicht kennt, wozu hilft der Hymnus dann? — Wir, die ihn kennen, haben uns versammelt hier.“
Paul Deussen - 1897
He who does not know that indestructible being of the Rig-veda, that highest ether-like (Self) wherein all the gods reside, of what use is the Rig-veda to him? Those only who know it, rest contented.<1>
<1: It is difficult to see how this verse comes in here. In the Taitt. Ār. II, 11, 6, it is quoted in connection with the syllable Om, the Akshara, in which all the Vedas are comprehended. It is similarly used in the Nṛsiṃha-pūrva-tāpanī, IV, 2; V, 2. In our passage, however, akshara is referred by Śaṅkara to the paramātman, and I have translated it accordingly. Ṛcaḥ is explained as a genitive singular, but it may also be taken as a nom. plur., and in that case both the verses of the Veda and the gods are said to reside in the Akshara, whether we take it for the Paramātman or for the Om. In the latter case, parame vyoman is explained by utkṛṣṭe and rakṣake.>
F. Max Müller - 1884
Of what use are the hymns of the Rig to him that does not know him, the immortal letter of the Rig (or the eternal meaning of the Rig,) the highest ether, in whom all gods abide? but those who know him, obtain the highest end.
Edward Röer - 1853
Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 4.9
छन्दांसि यज्ञाः क्रतवो व्रतानि भूतं भव्यं यच्च वेदा वदन्ति |
chandāṃsi yajñāḥ, kratavo vratāni; bhūtaṃ bhavyaṃ, yac ca vedā vadanti | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
chandāṃsi
nominative plural
substantive neuter
metrical verses, sacred texts
yajñāḥ
nominative plural
substantive masculine
sacrifices
kratavaḥ
nominative plural
substantive masculine
rites
vratāni
nominative plural
substantive neuter
vows
bhūtam
nominative singular neuter past participle passive
verbal root
what has become
bhavyam
nominative singular neuter future participle passive
verbal root
what is to be
yat
accusative singular neuter
pronoun rel
what
ca
particle
and
vedāḥ
nominative plural
substantive masculine
the Vedas
vadanti
3rd person plural aktive present
verbal root
they proclaim
अस्मान्मायी सृजते विश्वमेतत्तस्मिंश्चान्यो मायया संनिरुद्धः ||9||
asmān māyī, sṛjate viśvam etat; tasmiṃś cānyo, māyayā saṃniruddhaḥ ||9|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
asmāt
ablative singular neuter
pronoun dem
from this
māyī
nominative singular
substantive masculine
the wielder of Māyā
sṛjate
3rd person singular medial present
verbal root
he creates
viśvam
accusative singular neuter
adjective
the whole
etat
accusative singular neuter
pronoun dem
this
tasmin
lokative singular neuter
pronoun dem
in it
ca
particle
and
anyaḥ
nominative singular masculine
pronoun quant
the other
māyayā
instrumental case singular
substantive feminine
through Māyā
saṃniruddhaḥ
nominative singular masculine past participle passive
previx
previx
verbal root
bound
Metre: Pāda 1: Triṣṭubh with Vajrā ending; Pāda 2: Triṣṭubh with Śālinī ending; Pāda 3: Triṣṭubh with Śālinī ending; Pāda 4: Triṣṭubh with Śālinī ending
From this (asmāt | abl sg n), the wielder of Māyā (māyī | nom sg) creates (sṛjate | 3p sg med pres) this (etat | acc sg n) whole (viśvam | acc sg n): the sacred texts (chandāṃsi | nom pl), the sacrifices (yajñāḥ | nom pl), the rites (kratavaḥ | nom pl), the vows (vratāni | nom pl), what has become (bhūtam | nom sg n ppp), what is to be (bhavyam | nom sg n pfp), and (ca) whatever (yat | acc sg n) the Vedas (vedāḥ | nom pl) proclaim (vadanti | 3p pl act pres). In it (tasmin | loc sg n), the other (anyaḥ | nom sg m) too (ca) is bound (saṃniruddhaḥ | nom sg m ppp) by Māyā (māyayā | ins sg).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
The sacred texts, sacrifices, rites and vows, past and future, and everything the Vedas teach arise from that Imperishable. The Lord of Māyā creates this world from it; within that world Māyā holds the individual self captive.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara lets Vedas, rites and the world of time arise from immutable Brahman through its own Māyā. In the cosmos thus projected, the Jīva appears bound through that same Māyā and wanders in Saṃsāra.

Śaṅkara's Bhāṣya on the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad

Śaṅkarānanda classifies Chandas, sacrifices, vows, and past, present and future as products of the Māyin. Īśvara creates the fivefold world; the Jīva who appears distinct from him is held in it by Avidyā.

Śaṅkarānanda's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Nārāyaṇa understands the Vedic and temporal order broadly: Chandas, types of sacrifice, vows and everything denoted by the Vedas belong to it. The Māyin creates this whole, while the Jīva is completely bound within it by Māyā.

Nārāyaṇa's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Vijñānabhagavat understands Vedas, rites and all three times as effects of Brahman's Māyā. The immutable ground does not itself become world-matter but appears as creator through its power. In the same total and individual world, enclosed by Māyā, it receives the designation Jīva.

Vijñānabhagavat's Śvetāśvataropaniṣadvivaraṇa
Aus dem die Hymnen, Opfer, Werk, Gelübde, Vergangnes, Künftiges, Vedalehren stammen. Der hat als Zauberer diese Welt geschaffen. In der der andre<1> ist verstrickt durch Blendwerk.
<1: Der andre, anya, kann nur die Vers 6–7 erwähnte individuelle Seele sein.>
Paul Deussen - 1921
Sacred poetry (chandas), the sacrifices, the ceremonies, the ordinances, The past, the future, and what the Vedas declare—This whole world the illusion-maker (māyin) projects out of this [Brahma]. And in it by illusion (māyā) the other<1> is confined.
<1: That is, the individual soul.>
Robert Hume - 1921
The Vedas, the Sacrifices without Soma, the Sacrifices with Soma, the vows, the Past, the Future (and the Present), (in short) whatever the Vedas speak of, is born from the Supreme Being. (He), accompanied with Maya, created this universe, and in that (universe) the other (individual soul) is fettered by Maya.
Siddhesvar Varma Shastri - 1916
Aus dem die Hymnen, Opfer, Werk, Gelübde, Vergangnes, Künftiges, Vedalehren stammen. Der hat als Zauberer diese Welt geschaffen. In der der andre<1> ist verstrickt durch Blendwerk.
<1: Der andre, anya, kann nur die Vers 6–7 erwähnte individuelle Seele sein.>
Paul Deussen - 1897
That from which the maker (māyin<1>) sends forth all this—the sacred verses, the offerings, the sacrifices, the panaceas, the past, the future, and all that the Vedas declare—in that the other is bound up through that māyā.
<1: It is impossible to find terms corresponding to māyā and māyin. Māyā means making, or art, but as all making or creating, so far as the Supreme Self is concerned, is phenomenal only or mere illusion, māyā conveys at the same time the sense of illusion. In the same manner māyin is the maker, the artist, but also the magician or juggler. What seems intended by our verse is that from the akshara, which corresponds to brahman, all proceeds, whatever exists or seems to exist, but that the actual creator or the author of all emanations is Īśa, the Lord, who, as creator, is acting through māyā or devātmaśakti. Possibly, however, anya, the other, may be meant for the individual purusha.>
F. Max Müller - 1884
The sacred metres, the sacrifices, offerings, expiations, what has been, what is to be, and what the Vedas declare, (all spring forth) from that (immortal letter).<1>—United with delusion (Māyā), he creates the universe; to this the other (the individual) soul is chained by delusion (Māyā).
<1: Or, according to Śankara’s explanation: The sacred metres, the sacrifices, offerings, expiations, what has been, and what is to be, all, according to the evidence of the Vedas, springs from that immortal letter.>
Edward Röer - 1853
Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 4.10
मायां तु प्रकृतिं विद्यान्मायिनं तु महेश्वरम् |
māyāṃ tu prakṛtiṃ vidyān; māyinaṃ tu maheśvaram | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
māyām
accusative singular
substantive feminine
Māyā
tu
particle
however
prakṛtim
accusative singular
substantive feminine
primordial nature, Prakṛti
vidyāt
3rd person singular aktive optative
verbal root
one should know
māyinam
accusative singular
substantive masculine
the wielder of Māyā
tu
particle
however
maheśvaram
accusative singular
substantive masculine
the great Lord, Maheśvara
तस्यावयवभूतैस्तु व्याप्तं सर्वमिदं जगत् ||10||
tasyāvayava-bhūtais tu; vyāptaṃ sarvam idaṃ jagat ||10|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
tasya
genitive singular masculine
pronoun dem
his
avayava
upapada-compound
substantive masculine
as limbs, parts
bhūtaiḥ
instrumental case plural masculine past participle passive
verbal root
become
tu
particle
however
vyāptam
nominative singular neuter past participle passive
previx
verbal root
pervaded
sarvam
nominative singular neuter
pronoun quant
all
idam
nominative singular neuter
pronoun dem
this
jagat
nominative singular
substantive neuter
world
Metre: Anuṣṭubh
One should know (vidyāt | 3p sg act opt) Prakṛti (prakṛtim | acc sg) as Māyā (māyām | acc sg), however (tu), and Maheśvara (maheśvaram | acc sg) as the wielder of Māyā (māyinam | acc sg), however (tu). By [beings] that have become his (tasya | gen sg m) limbs (avayava-bhūtaiḥ | ins pl m ppp), however (tu), this (idam | nom sg n) entire (sarvam | nom sg n) world (jagat | nom sg) is pervaded (vyāptam | nom sg n ppp).
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - historically literal
Know Prakṛti as Māyā and Maheśvara as its Lord. The whole world is pervaded by beings that form his limbs.
Dr. Ronald Steiner - 2026 - modern transfer

The Bhāṣya attributed to Śaṅkara expressly defines Māyā as Prakṛti and Maheśvara as its conscious bearer. The world is not incorporated into him as a real transformation, but is spread out through the superimposition of his apparent parts, like a snake upon a rope.

Śaṅkara's Bhāṣya on the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad

Śaṅkarānanda calls Māyā the material cause of the world and Maheśvara the controller even of the great deities. The whole conscious and unconscious universe is pervaded by the effects of this Māyin, which are designated as his limbs.

Śaṅkarānanda's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Nārāyaṇa understands beings and parts of the world as limbs of Maheśvara only figuratively. Through these limb-like Jīvas, the entire world is filled by the Lord without his essential nature being composite.

Nārāyaṇa's Śvetāśvataropaniṣaddīpikā

Vijñānabhagavat describes Māyā as the cause of the world and a dependent superimposition. Maheśvara gives it being and luminosity without transforming himself into it; like silver upon mother-of-pearl, the whole visible universe appears upon non-dual consciousness and can be cancelled by right knowledge.

Vijñānabhagavat's Śvetāśvataropaniṣadvivaraṇa
Als Blendwerk die Natur wisse, Als den Zaub’rer den höchsten Gott; Doch<1> ist von seinen Teilstoffen Durchdrungen diese ganze Welt.
<1: Die Natur ist doch nicht völlig wesenlose Māyā, sofern sie von den (individuellen) Seelen durchzogen wird, welche hier wie öfter (Bṛh. 2,1,20. Muṇḍ. 2,1,1 etc.) bildlich als Teile des Brahman vorgestellt werden und an seiner Realität teilhaben.>
Paul Deussen - 1921
Now, one should know that Nature (Prakṛti) is illusion (māyā), And that the Mighty Lord (maheśvara) is the illusion-maker (māyin). This whole world is pervaded With beings that are parts of Him.
Robert Hume - 1921
The material cause (of the universe) should be known as Maya alone, and the supreme God should be known as only the Controller (or Life-Giver) of Maya. By His portions this world is pervaded.
Siddhesvar Varma Shastri - 1916
Als Blendwerk die Natur wisse, Als den Zaub’rer den höchsten Gott; Doch<1> ist von seinen Teilstoffen Durchdrungen diese ganze Welt.
<1: Die Natur ist doch nicht völlig wesenlose Māyā, sofern sie von den (individuellen) Seelen durchzogen wird, welche hier wie öfter (Bṛh. 2,1,20. Muṇḍ. 2,1,1 etc.) bildlich als Teile des Brahman vorgestellt werden und an seiner Realität teilhaben.>
Paul Deussen - 1897
Know then Prakṛti (nature) is Māyā (art), and the great Lord the Māyin (maker); the whole world is filled with what are his members.
F. Max Müller - 1884
Know delusion (Māyā) as nature (Prakriti), him<1> who is united with her, as the Great Ruler (Maheśwara); this whole world in truth is pervaded by (powers which are) his parts.<2>
<1: Attempt to reconcile the doctrine of the Vedānta with the Sānkhya.>
<2: Or, by the elements (the five great elements) which are his parts.>
Edward Röer - 1853

Continue with AYI Free

Illustrations: AI-generated.

Messages and ratings
0 messages

Please log in to write a message. Go to login

No messages yet.