atha prasaṅgād abhyāsārthaṃ kecana upayuktāḥ kumbhakāḥ kathyante | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
saṅkarṣako rodha-balaṃ hi yāvat; sammuhya nāsā-yuga-randhra-mūlam | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
saṅkarṣakaḥ
|
saṅkarṣaka
|
drawing in |
|
rodha
|
of retention | |
|
balam
|
strength | |
|
hi
|
for | |
|
yāvat
|
as long as | |
|
sammuhya
|
having become confused; the proposed sense of closing is not lexically established | |
|
nāsā
|
of the nose | |
|
yuga
|
of the pair | |
|
randhra
|
of the openings | |
|
mūlam
|
the base |
kuryāt tad-agre nanu reca-pūrāv; utkarṣa-kumbhaḥ kathitaḥ sa dhātrā ||22|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
I supplement the elliptical opening as “[retains the breath] for as long as the strength to retain [allows]”. This connects the instruction with yāvat.
āmuhya ghoṇārdham adho-vibhāge; yad reca-pūrau vidadhāti tiṣṭhan | Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
|
āmuhya
|
having become confused; the proposed sense of closing is not lexically established | |
|
ghoṇā
|
of the nose | |
|
ardham
|
one half | |
|
adhas
|
below | |
|
vibhāge
|
in the region | |
|
yat
|
when | |
|
reca
|
exhalation | |
|
pūrau
|
and inhalation | |
|
vidadhāti
|
he performs | |
|
tiṣṭhan
|
remaining |
sa eṣa kumbho gadito vidhātrā; nāmnāpakarṣaḥ praṇavātmanā 'yam ||23|| Analysis ▾ Analysis ▴
I connect adho-vibhāge with tiṣṭhan: “remains in the lower region”. I understand yat … sa eṣaḥ as a conditional construction, supplying “[is]”; the name Apakarṣa follows in a separate sentence.
praṇavātmanā 'yam GDJ2007 ] praṇavātmanā'dhyaṃ GDJ2007-b
Continue with AYI Free
Illustrations: AI-generated.
Please log in to write a message. Go to login
No messages yet.